Government of Gujarat vs Dhanrajsinh Rajendrasinh Parmar Advocate - R D PARMAR — 325/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN060005862024
Filing Number
325/2024
Filing Date
06-Aug-2024
Registration No
325/2024
Registration Date
06-Aug-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MULI
Judge
27-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
5240103
Police Station
MULI POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhanrajsinh Rajendrasinh Parmar Advocate - R D PARMAR
-
2.Hitendrasinh Janaksinh Parmar
Adv. R D PARMAR
-
3.Dharmendrasinh @ Dhambha Jayubha Parmar
Adv. R D PARMAR
-
4.Surpalsinh Digubha Parmar
Adv. R D PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Criminal Case 325/2024 The court acquitted all four defendants (Dhanrajsinh, Hitendrasinh, Dharmendrasinh, and Surpalsinh Parmar) of charges under IPC sections 332, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused threatened and assaulted him during a road construction dispute on March 20, 2024, the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2025
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2025
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2025
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Mar-2025
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2025
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Oct-2024
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 325/2024
Case Summary: Criminal Case 325/2024 The court acquitted all four defendants (Dhanrajsinh, Hitendrasinh, Dharmendrasinh, and Surpalsinh Parmar) of charges under IPC sections 332, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused threatened and assaulted him during a road construction dispute on March 20, 2024, the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts