Government of Gujarat vs Dhanrajsinh Rajendrasinh Parmar Advocate - R D PARMAR — 325/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN060005862024

Filing Number

325/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

325/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MULI

Judge

27-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5240103

Police Station

MULI POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 332,504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanrajsinh Rajendrasinh Parmar Advocate - R D PARMAR

  2. 2.Hitendrasinh Janaksinh Parmar

    Adv. R D PARMAR

  3. 3.Dharmendrasinh @ Dhambha Jayubha Parmar

    Adv. R D PARMAR

  4. 4.Surpalsinh Digubha Parmar

    Adv. R D PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 325/2024 The court acquitted all four defendants (Dhanrajsinh, Hitendrasinh, Dharmendrasinh, and Surpalsinh Parmar) of charges under IPC sections 332, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused threatened and assaulted him during a road construction dispute on March 20, 2024, the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 19-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 15-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 16-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Jan-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 27-Dec-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 22-Nov-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 11-Oct-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 06-Sep-2024

    Framing Of Charge

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 325/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 325/2024 The court acquitted all four defendants (Dhanrajsinh, Hitendrasinh, Dharmendrasinh, and Surpalsinh Parmar) of charges under IPC sections 332, 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused threatened and assaulted him during a road construction dispute on March 20, 2024, the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case