State Bank of India Sarla Branch through manager Girishbhai Maisurbhai Chavda vs DEVSJIBHAI MOTIBHAI SORAMIYA — 26/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,2,9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN060000902026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MULI
Judge
27-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank of India Sarla Branch through manager Girishbhai Maisurbhai Chavda
Adv. D M JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVSJIBHAI MOTIBHAI SORAMIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary The Principal Civil Court of Muli partially granted State Bank of India's claim against defendant Devsjibhai Motibhai Soramiya for recovery of agricultural loan dues. The court found that the defendant borrowed ₹7,50,000 under a Kisan Credit Card account in 2018, withdrew ₹6,96,000, but failed to repay the outstanding amount despite multiple notices and revival letters from the bank. The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹6,96,000 with simple interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit claim, along with court costs. The decision was based on documentary evidence including loan agreements, revival letters, and the bank manager's testimony establishing the debt and defendant's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2026
Case Summary The Principal Civil Court of Muli partially granted State Bank of India's claim against defendant Devsjibhai Motibhai Soramiya for recovery of agricultural loan dues. The court found that the defendant borrowed ₹7,50,000 under a Kisan Credit Card account in 2018, withdrew ₹6,96,000, but failed to repay the outstanding amount despite multiple notices and revival letters from the bank. The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹6,96,000 with simple interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit claim, along with court costs. The decision was based on documentary evidence including loan agreements, revival letters, and the bank manager's testimony establishing the debt and defendant's default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts