Government of Gujarat vs PRAVINBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI SHAPARA Advocate - H B DAVE — 850/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN040011412025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
850/2025
Filing Date
17-09-2025
Registration No
850/2025
Registration Date
17-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAYLA
Judge
28-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAVINBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI SHAPARA Advocate - H B DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 28-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Pravinbhai Thakarshibhai Shapra, of charges under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and Indian Penal Code Sections 177, 184, 134(b), finding insufficient evidence that he recklessly or negligently caused a road accident. While the complainant's injuries were medically confirmed, the prosecution failed to prove the accused personally and intentionally operated the vehicle that caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Pravinbhai Thakarshibhai Shapra, of charges under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and Indian Penal Code Sections 177, 184, 134(b), finding insufficient evidence that he recklessly or negligently caused a road accident. While the complainant's injuries were medically confirmed, the prosecution failed to prove the accused personally and intentionally operated the vehicle that caused the collision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts