Government of Gujarat vs NAVAGHANBHAI NAGJIBHAI GELADIYA Advocate - H B DAVE — 617/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN040008692025

Filing Number

617/2025

Filing Date

22-Jul-2025

Registration No

617/2025

Registration Date

22-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAYLA

Judge

28-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116B,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVAGHANBHAI NAGJIBHAI GELADIYA Advocate - H B DAVE

  2. 2.MAHIPALNATH JESALNATH BLOCH

    Adv. null

  3. 3.SOHILBHAI RAMJANBHAI MAMANI

    Adv. null

  4. 4.SURAJBHAI DHIRUBHAI GELADIYA

    Adv. null

  5. 5.KRUSNKUMARSINH SHIVARAJBHAI ZALA

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary Case No. C.C. 617/2025 | Sayla First Class Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons under the Prohibition Act for lack of sufficient evidence. While liquor bottles and vehicles were allegedly seized from their possession, the court found critical procedural and evidentiary gaps—including inadequate panchnama (witness documentation), no independent witness corroboration, and failure to establish the accused's direct possession of the contraband goods from the sealed office space where they were allegedly found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 617/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Case No. C.C. 617/2025 | Sayla First Class Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons under the Prohibition Act for lack of sufficient evidence. While liquor bottles and vehicles were allegedly seized from their possession, the court found critical procedural and evidentiary gaps—including inadequate panchnama (witness documentation), no independent witness corroboration, and failure to establish the accused's direct possession of the contraband goods from the sealed office space where they were allegedly found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case