Government of Gujarat vs SIDHARAJBHAI GABHARUBHAI DHANDHAL Advocate - J A DHANDHAL — 86/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a),65(e) 116(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN040001842025

Filing Number

86/2025

Filing Date

10-Feb-2025

Registration No

86/2025

Registration Date

10-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAYLA

Judge

28-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

448

Police Station

SAYALA POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a),65(e) 116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIDHARAJBHAI GABHARUBHAI DHANDHAL Advocate - J A DHANDHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 86/2025 The court acquitted defendant Sidharajbhai Gabharubhai Dhandhal of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(A,I) and 116(B)) for alleged illegal possession and sale of 66 sealed bottles of foreign whisky. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies: the panchnama (official inventory record) lacked witness signatures and corroboration, no independent witnesses were produced to verify the seizure, and the seizure procedure itself was not properly substantiated. The judgment emphasized that possession alone cannot be conclusively established without credible, independent corroboration and properly conducted procedural safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 10-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 86/2025 The court acquitted defendant Sidharajbhai Gabharubhai Dhandhal of charges under the Prohibition Act (Section 65(A,I) and 116(B)) for alleged illegal possession and sale of 66 sealed bottles of foreign whisky. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies: the panchnama (official inventory record) lacked witness signatures and corroboration, no independent witnesses were produced to verify the seizure, and the seizure procedure itself was not properly substantiated. The judgment emphasized that possession alone cannot be conclusively established without credible, independent corroboration and properly conducted procedural safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case