P.G.V.C.L. PANSHINA SUB DIVISION vs HAMIRBHAI HARJIBHAI GALTHARA — 496/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN030023052025

Filing Number

496/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

496/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L. PANSHINA SUB DIVISION

    Adv. H N RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAMIRBHAI HARJIBHAI GALTHARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: RCS/496/2025 Court Decision: The civil suit filed by P.G.V.C.L. Panshina Sub Division against Hamirbhai Harjibhai Galthara for recovery of damages due to electricity theft was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the CPC for lack of jurisdiction. Key Reasoning: The court held that disputes concerning civil liability in electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153, not civil courts. While Section 145 lacks an express bar, the court found an *implied* jurisdictional bar based on Section 154(5), which empowers only Special Courts to determine civil liability for theft. Therefore, the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain this suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 496/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS/496/2025 Court Decision: The civil suit filed by P.G.V.C.L. Panshina Sub Division against Hamirbhai Harjibhai Galthara for recovery of damages due to electricity theft was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the CPC for lack of jurisdiction. Key Reasoning: The court held that disputes concerning civil liability in electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153, not civil courts. While Section 145 lacks an express bar, the court found an *implied* jurisdictional bar based on Section 154(5), which empowers only Special Courts to determine civil liability for theft. Therefore, the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain this suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case