Government of Gujarat vs P. RATHINAVEL PALANIAPA GOUNDER Advocate - D K PARMAR — 692/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN030015132024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
692/2024
Filing Date
01-10-2024
Registration No
692/2024
Registration Date
01-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI
Judge
22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
P. RATHINAVEL PALANIAPA GOUNDER Advocate - D K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 19-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 11-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi, Surendranagar acquitted the accused (P. Rathnavel Palaniappa Sigod Gounder) of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the rash or negligent driving and death claims beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided insufficient direct evidence that the accused's truck caused the fatal tractor accident, and the evidence did not prove the essential elements of the criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi, Surendranagar acquitted the accused (P. Rathnavel Palaniappa Sigod Gounder) of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the rash or negligent driving and death claims beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided insufficient direct evidence that the accused's truck caused the fatal tractor accident, and the evidence did not prove the essential elements of the criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts