Government of Gujarat vs P. RATHINAVEL PALANIAPA GOUNDER Advocate - D K PARMAR — 692/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN030015132024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

692/2024

Filing Date

01-10-2024

Registration No

692/2024

Registration Date

01-10-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,304A,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

P. RATHINAVEL PALANIAPA GOUNDER Advocate - D K PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

19-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

04-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi, Surendranagar acquitted the accused (P. Rathnavel Palaniappa Sigod Gounder) of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the rash or negligent driving and death claims beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided insufficient direct evidence that the accused's truck caused the fatal tractor accident, and the evidence did not prove the essential elements of the criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi, Surendranagar acquitted the accused (P. Rathnavel Palaniappa Sigod Gounder) of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding that the prosecution failed to establish the rash or negligent driving and death claims beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the complainant's witnesses provided insufficient direct evidence that the accused's truck caused the fatal tractor accident, and the evidence did not prove the essential elements of the criminal offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case