Government of Gujarat vs GANGARAMBHAI DHUDABHAI PARNALIYA Advocate - S V VAGHELA — 370/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506(2),114,427,. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN030009432020

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

370/2020

Filing Date

21-09-2020

Registration No

370/2020

Registration Date

21-09-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,324,504,506(2),114,427,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GANGARAMBHAI DHUDABHAI PARNALIYA Advocate - S V VAGHELA

JERAMBHAI DHUDABHAI PARNALIYA

Adv. S V VAGHELA

ALPABEN W/O JERAMBHAI DHUDABHAI PARNALIYA

Adv. S V VAGHELA

KISHNBHAI @ ASHVINBHAI JERAMBHAI PARNALIYA

Adv. S V VAGHELA

RANJITBHAI GOBARBHAI @ VASHRAMBHAI PARNALIYA

Adv. S V VAGHELA

BHARAT @ HAKABHAI SANKARBHAI PARNALIYA

Adv. S V VAGHELA

Hearing History

Judge: 22-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

31-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

12-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

Interim Orders

18-09-2024
ORDER

SUMMARY: The bail application of accused Bhagirath Singh Jhala and TP Zala in Criminal Case No. 11/2018 (Cr.M.A No 237/2024) is rejected. The court found that both accused breached bail conditions by failing to appear for 45 days continuously despite the matter being at the judgment stage, providing no satisfactory reasons for absence. The court directed them to pay Rs. 25,000 each towards their previously granted personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The bail application of accused Bhagirath Singh Jhala and TP Zala in Criminal Case No. 11/2018 (Cr.M.A No 237/2024) is rejected. The court found that both accused breached bail conditions by failing to appear for 45 days continuously despite the matter being at the judgment stage, providing no satisfactory reasons for absence. The court directed them to pay Rs. 25,000 each towards their previously granted personal bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case