GUJARNAR PATEL RATANBEN NAGARBHAI NA VARASDARO(Legal Heir) vs GUJARNAR KHIMABHAI ZAVERBHAI NA VARASDAR Advocate - G G SOLANKI1. — 164/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN030005592022
Filing Number
164/2022
Filing Date
21-Jun-2022
Registration No
164/2022
Registration Date
21-Jun-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI
Judge
22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GUJARNAR PATEL RATANBEN NAGARBHAI NA VARASDARO(Legal Heir)
Adv. M K CHAUHAN1.
-
2.PATEL NARAYANBHAI NAGARBHAI
Adv. M K CHAUHAN1.
-
3.GANPATBHAI NAGARBHAI
Adv. M K CHAUHAN1.
-
4.ISHVARBHAI NAGARBHAI
Adv. M K CHAUHAN1.
-
5.NANUBHAI NAGARBHAI
Adv. M K CHAUHAN1.
-
6.MANJUBEN NAGARBHAI
Adv. M K CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.GUJARNAR KHIMABHAI ZAVERBHAI NA VARASDAR Advocate - G G SOLANKI1.
-
2.PITAMBARBHAI KHIMABHAI
Adv. G S ATULIYA
-
3.GUJARNAR BHAGABHAI UKABHAI KOLI PATEL NA VARASDAR(Legal Heir)
-
4.GUJARNAR SHIVABHAI UKABHAI KOLI PATEL NA VARASDAR(Legal Heir) 3.
-
5.RAMUBEN SHIVABHAI KOLI PATEL
-
6.GUJARNAR NANJIBHAI UKABHAI KOLI PATEL NA VARASDAR(Legal Heir)
-
7.GUJARNAR DHARMENDRASINH VAJUBHA NA VARASDAR(Legal Heir) 5.
-
8.NITABA DHARMENDRASINH RANA
Adv. G G SOLANKI
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2025
OrderView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S 164/2022 This property dispute involves competing claims to agricultural land (Survey No. 20, approximately 9 acres) in Ghaghosar village, Surendranagar, Gujarat. The plaintiff (legal heir of Ratanben) sought interim injunction claiming ownership through a 1991 sale deed, alleging defendants held excess land due to errors in a 1969 sale deed. Defendants (5.1-5.3) countered that they legitimately owned the property since 1969 and filed their own interim injunction application. The court rejected both interim injunction applications (dated 05/05/2025), finding neither party adequately proved prima facie case or actual possession. The judge noted critical gaps: no evidence of current possession by either party, no tax records, missing family genealogy, and inconsistent documentary claims. Without clear proof of possession or rights, the court declined to restrict either party's access to the disputed land, finding balance of convenience favored neither side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2025
Issues
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Mar-2025
Order On Urgent Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2025
Interim Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2025
Interim Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2025
Interim Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jan-2025
Interim Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2024
Interim Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2024
Rejoinder
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2024
Rejoinder
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Nov-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2023
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Dec-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Sep-2022
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 164/2022
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S 164/2022 This property dispute involves competing claims to agricultural land (Survey No. 20, approximately 9 acres) in Ghaghosar village, Surendranagar, Gujarat. The plaintiff (legal heir of Ratanben) sought interim injunction claiming ownership through a 1991 sale deed, alleging defendants held excess land due to errors in a 1969 sale deed. Defendants (5.1-5.3) countered that they legitimately owned the property since 1969 and filed their own interim injunction application. The court rejected both interim injunction applications (dated 05/05/2025), finding neither party adequately proved prima facie case or actual possession. The judge noted critical gaps: no evidence of current possession by either party, no tax records, missing family genealogy, and inconsistent documentary claims. Without clear proof of possession or rights, the court declined to restrict either party's access to the disputed land, finding balance of convenience favored neither side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts