RANA KISHORSINH TEMUBHA vs ZALA HARISINH BAVUBHA Advocate - K B SHAH — 43/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,16. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN030001752025

Filing Number

43/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

43/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANA KISHORSINH TEMUBHA

    Adv. H N RAVAL

  2. 2.RANA MADANSINH TEMUBHA

    Adv. H N RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZALA HARISINH BAVUBHA Advocate - K B SHAH

  2. 2.BHARWAD OGHADBHAI BHALABHAI

    Adv. K B SHAH

  3. 3.BHARWAD DEVKARANBHAI OGHADBHAI

    Adv. K B SHAH

  4. 4.BHARWAD JAYESHBHAI OGHADBHAI

    Adv. K B SHAH

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 05-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 06-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 30-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 30-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 29-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

  20. 19-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 15-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 07-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 43/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction partially allowed. The court partially granted the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction in this property dispute involving adjoining agricultural and residential plots in Gujarat. The court restrained defendants from entering the plaintiffs' survey no. 752 land or constructing on it, and prohibited construction that would block a 12-meter passage way between residential plots—except construction that would facilitate passage access. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' broader claims regarding passage rights through the defendants' converted non-agricultural land, finding they have alternative access routes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 07-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Feb-2025

    Order On Interim Hearing

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Feb-2025

    Order On Interim Hearing

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 31-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 43/2025 Outcome: Interim injunction partially allowed. The court partially granted the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction in this property dispute involving adjoining agricultural and residential plots in Gujarat. The court restrained defendants from entering the plaintiffs' survey no. 752 land or constructing on it, and prohibited construction that would block a 12-meter passage way between residential plots—except construction that would facilitate passage access. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' broader claims regarding passage rights through the defendants' converted non-agricultural land, finding they have alternative access routes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case