P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division vs GAGJIBHAI VAHABHAI (RANCHHODBHAI) SONDALA — 6/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN030000482026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division

    Adv. H N RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAGJIBHAI VAHABHAI (RANCHHODBHAI) SONDALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: RCS/06/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for recovery of electricity theft damages under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction over such matters. Key Reasoning: The court determined that electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act. Section 145 of the Act impliedly bars civil courts from entertaining disputes regarding civil liability in theft cases, which are determined by Special Courts under Section 154(5). Since the defendant was found illegally using electricity without being a customer, and this constituted theft rather than mere unauthorized use, only a Special Court could adjudicate the plaintiff's damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS/06/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for recovery of electricity theft damages under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction over such matters. Key Reasoning: The court determined that electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act. Section 145 of the Act impliedly bars civil courts from entertaining disputes regarding civil liability in theft cases, which are determined by Special Courts under Section 154(5). Since the defendant was found illegally using electricity without being a customer, and this constituted theft rather than mere unauthorized use, only a Special Court could adjudicate the plaintiff's damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case