P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division vs GAGJIBHAI VAHABHAI (RANCHHODBHAI) SONDALA — 6/2026
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN030000482026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI
Judge
22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division
Adv. H N RAVAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAGJIBHAI VAHABHAI (RANCHHODBHAI) SONDALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: RCS/06/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for recovery of electricity theft damages under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction over such matters. Key Reasoning: The court determined that electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act. Section 145 of the Act impliedly bars civil courts from entertaining disputes regarding civil liability in theft cases, which are determined by Special Courts under Section 154(5). Since the defendant was found illegally using electricity without being a customer, and this constituted theft rather than mere unauthorized use, only a Special Court could adjudicate the plaintiff's damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Case Summary: RCS/06/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for recovery of electricity theft damages under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction over such matters. Key Reasoning: The court determined that electricity theft cases under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act. Section 145 of the Act impliedly bars civil courts from entertaining disputes regarding civil liability in theft cases, which are determined by Special Courts under Section 154(5). Since the defendant was found illegally using electricity without being a customer, and this constituted theft rather than mere unauthorized use, only a Special Court could adjudicate the plaintiff's damage claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts