P.G.V.C.L. PANSHINA SUB DIVISION vs RANUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI ALGOTAR — 4/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN030000072026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L. PANSHINA SUB DIVISION

    Adv. H N RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI ALGOTAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: P.G.V.C.L. Panshina Sub Division v. Ranubhai Ranchhodbhai Algotar The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi rejected the electricity company's suit for recovery of damages from the defendant for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that disputes concerning civil liability in electricity theft cases fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act, and therefore Civil Courts are impliedly barred from entertaining such suits under Section 145 of the Electricity Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.G.V.C.L. Panshina Sub Division v. Ranubhai Ranchhodbhai Algotar The Additional Civil Judge at Limbdi rejected the electricity company's suit for recovery of damages from the defendant for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that disputes concerning civil liability in electricity theft cases fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of Special Courts established under Section 153 of the Act, and therefore Civil Courts are impliedly barred from entertaining such suits under Section 145 of the Electricity Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case