SHAH HARSHVARDHAN NARESHBHAI vs NOBODY — 7/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955(Central) Section 13(B)(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

HMP - HINDU MARRIAGE PETITION

CNR: GJSN020052052025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955(Central) Section 13(B)(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAH HARSHVARDHAN NARESHBHAI

    Adv. M B DAVE

  2. 2.MANSIBEN D/O HIMMATBHAI MAHETA W/O HARSHVARDHAN SHAH

    Adv. M B DAVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NOBODY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: HMP 7/2025 The court corrected a typographical error in a previous judgment (Case 16) by amending the name of the second petitioner from "Aratiben Mathkiya" to "Mansiben D/O Himmatbhai Maheta" on page 5. Relying on CPC Sections 152-153, which permit courts to correct accidental slips and omissions at any time, the court exercised its inherent authority to rectify the record and ensure accurate representation of the parties' names without prejudicing either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HMP 7/2025 The court corrected a typographical error in a previous judgment (Case 16) by amending the name of the second petitioner from "Aratiben Mathkiya" to "Mansiben D/O Himmatbhai Maheta" on page 5. Relying on CPC Sections 152-153, which permit courts to correct accidental slips and omissions at any time, the court exercised its inherent authority to rectify the record and ensure accurate representation of the parties' names without prejudicing either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case