TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI TE BHARAT MEDICAL AGENCYNA PARTNER vs BHAVIKBHAI N PATEL TE BHAGYODAY MEDICAL STORSNA PROP. — 17/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O9R4,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJSN020043722025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

17/2025

Filing Date

05-08-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

05-08-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section O9R4,

Petitioner(s)

TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI TE BHARAT MEDICAL AGENCYNA PARTNER

Adv. R K DAVE

Respondent(s)

BHAVIKBHAI N PATEL TE BHAGYODAY MEDICAL STORSNA PROP.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

06-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

ORDER ON URGENT HEARING

09-02-2026

ORDER ON URGENT HEARING

22-01-2026

ORDER ON URGENT HEARING

30-12-2025

ORDER ON URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
ORDER

The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,11,230 due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and failure to prosecute the case despite being given sufficient time. The court found that the defendant's non-appearance was justified by legal ignorance and honest mistake, and therefore allowed a conditional dismissal permitting the plaintiff to file the suit afresh within one year if the conditions were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,11,230 due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and failure to prosecute the case despite being given sufficient time. The court found that the defendant's non-appearance was justified by legal ignorance and honest mistake, and therefore allowed a conditional dismissal permitting the plaintiff to file the suit afresh within one year if the conditions were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case