TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI TE BHARAT MEDICAL AGENCYNA PARTNER vs BHAVIKBHAI N PATEL TE BHAGYODAY MEDICAL STORSNA PROP. — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O9R4. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJSN020043722025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
4-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TUSHAR PRAVINCHANDRA KOTHARI TE BHARAT MEDICAL AGENCYNA PARTNER
Adv. R K DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAVIKBHAI N PATEL TE BHAGYODAY MEDICAL STORSNA PROP.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,11,230 due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and failure to prosecute the case despite being given sufficient time. The court found that the defendant's non-appearance was justified by legal ignorance and honest mistake, and therefore allowed a conditional dismissal permitting the plaintiff to file the suit afresh within one year if the conditions were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Feb-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Jan-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Dec-2025
Order On Urgent Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Nov-2025
Order On Urgent Hearing
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Oct-2025
Order On Urgent Hearing
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2025
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,11,230 due to the plaintiff's prolonged absence and failure to prosecute the case despite being given sufficient time. The court found that the defendant's non-appearance was justified by legal ignorance and honest mistake, and therefore allowed a conditional dismissal permitting the plaintiff to file the suit afresh within one year if the conditions were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts