S G FINANCE vs GITABEN BAHADURBHAI KANZARIYA Advocate - S K PATHAN — 2735/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 25th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN020039772025

Filing Number

2735/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

2735/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S G FINANCE

    Adv. P H VAISHNAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GITABEN BAHADURBHAI KANZARIYA Advocate - S K PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 2735/2025 Court Decision: The Surendranagar Magistrate's Court convicted Gitaben Bahadurbhai Kanzariya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 55,000. The court found that S.G. Finance (petitioner) issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, and the accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of Rs. 55,000 as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 14-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 05-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 17-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 31-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  26. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  28. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  29. 16-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2735/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2735/2025 Court Decision: The Surendranagar Magistrate's Court convicted Gitaben Bahadurbhai Kanzariya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 55,000. The court found that S.G. Finance (petitioner) issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, and the accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered payment of Rs. 55,000 as compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case