ATISHKUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA THAKKAR vs RATNU JAYDIPSINH VISHNUDAN Advocate - K B SORIYA — 2708/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN020039292025

Filing Number

2708/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

2708/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATISHKUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA THAKKAR

    Adv. S A RAMANANDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATNU JAYDIPSINH VISHNUDAN Advocate - K B SORIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed the petition against the respondent advocate, finding that the petitioner's complaint did not constitute grounds to proceed against the accused. The court acquitted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and found the case suitable for settlement under Section 147, ordering the accused to pay the decretal amount. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 26-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 11-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 15-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2708/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition against the respondent advocate, finding that the petitioner's complaint did not constitute grounds to proceed against the accused. The court acquitted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and found the case suitable for settlement under Section 147, ordering the accused to pay the decretal amount. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case