Government of Gujarat vs AKARAMBHAI RAHEMATULLABHAI PATHAN Advocate - C P KHOKHARA — 1916/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN020025222024
Filing Number
1916/2024
Filing Date
26-Jun-2024
Registration No
1916/2024
Registration Date
26-Jun-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7240438
Police Station
SURENDRANAGAR CITY A DIVISION POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AKARAMBHAI RAHEMATULLABHAI PATHAN Advocate - C P KHOKHARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
Judegement
Summary of Case 1916/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Akrambhai Rahematullabhai Pathan) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506(2) and JPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence of guilt beyond reasonable doubt regarding an alleged assault incident dated 28/03/2024 in Surendranagar. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity positively without a proper Test Identification Parade (TIP), relying instead on dock identification by complainant witnesses who had no prior familiarity with the accused. Medical evidence of injuries and CCTV footage alone could not definitively prove the accused's guilt on the allegations of causing hurt with a stick and making criminal threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1916/2024
Summary of Case 1916/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Akrambhai Rahematullabhai Pathan) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506(2) and JPC Section 135, finding insufficient evidence of guilt beyond reasonable doubt regarding an alleged assault incident dated 28/03/2024 in Surendranagar. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity positively without a proper Test Identification Parade (TIP), relying instead on dock identification by complainant witnesses who had no prior familiarity with the accused. Medical evidence of injuries and CCTV footage alone could not definitively prove the accused's guilt on the allegations of causing hurt with a stick and making criminal threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts