ANSARI MUHAMMADHUSEN RAHAMTULLAH vs BABUBHAI JUSABBHAI LAKHAVA Advocate - E C PARMAR — 1644/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN020021112024

Filing Number

1644/2024

Filing Date

28-May-2024

Registration No

1644/2024

Registration Date

28-May-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANSARI MUHAMMADHUSEN RAHAMTULLAH

    Adv. N D JANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABUBHAI JUSABBHAI LAKHAVA Advocate - E C PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 1644/2024 The court convicted Babubhai Jusabbhai Lakhava under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,65,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The petitioner had purchased a property plot, paid partial amount, and received the cheque as security for remaining payment, which subsequently failed to clear. The court imposed one year simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,65,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 14-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 06-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 04-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 31-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 24-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 27-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 21-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 24-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 03-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 06-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 07-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 24-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 21-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 16-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 17-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 21-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 16-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 18-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 28-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 28-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1644/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1644/2024 The court convicted Babubhai Jusabbhai Lakhava under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,65,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The petitioner had purchased a property plot, paid partial amount, and received the cheque as security for remaining payment, which subsequently failed to clear. The court imposed one year simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,65,000 to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case