AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED vs PANKAJBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI JOSHI — 177/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSN020013152026

Filing Number

177/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. A S RANGPARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJBHAI MADHAVJIBHAI JOSHI

  2. 2.VIMLABEN MADHAVJIBHAI JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Aadhar Housing Finance Limited's SARFAESI Act application against borrowers Pankajbhai and Vimlaben Joshi, who defaulted on a Rs. 6,43,802 cash credit facility. Finding the account classified as NPA and the demand notice of Rs. 3,71,391 unpaid despite sufficient time granted, the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the respondents' secured property in Surendranagar and directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 20,000 toward expenses within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Aadhar Housing Finance Limited's SARFAESI Act application against borrowers Pankajbhai and Vimlaben Joshi, who defaulted on a Rs. 6,43,802 cash credit facility. Finding the account classified as NPA and the demand notice of Rs. 3,71,391 unpaid despite sufficient time granted, the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the respondents' secured property in Surendranagar and directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 20,000 toward expenses within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case