Government of Gujarat vs BHAVESH @ BHAVIN NAROTAMBHAI SOLANKI JATE.ANU.JATI — 951/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN020012542024

Filing Number

951/2024

Filing Date

22-Mar-2024

Registration No

951/2024

Registration Date

22-Mar-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESH @ BHAVIN NAROTAMBHAI SOLANKI JATE.ANU.JATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Surendranagar District Court ordered the abatement of criminal proceedings against the accused under CrPC Section 258, as the accused could not be produced before the court despite the issuance of a warrant and the police's efforts to apprehend them proved unsuccessful. The court found it impractical to continue the trial without the accused's presence and reasoned that there was no likelihood of the accused being found in the foreseeable future, making further judicial action impossible under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 02-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 06-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 28-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 21-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 04-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 02-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 06-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 24-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 17-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 20-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 21-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 12-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 01-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 10-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 22-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 22-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 951/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Surendranagar District Court ordered the abatement of criminal proceedings against the accused under CrPC Section 258, as the accused could not be produced before the court despite the issuance of a warrant and the police's efforts to apprehend them proved unsuccessful. The court found it impractical to continue the trial without the accused's presence and reasoned that there was no likelihood of the accused being found in the foreseeable future, making further judicial action impossible under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case