Government of Gujarat vs BHAVESH @ BHAVIN NAROTAMBHAI SOLANKI JATE.ANU.JATI — 951/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN020012542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
951/2024
Filing Date
22-03-2024
Registration No
951/2024
Registration Date
22-03-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHAVESH @ BHAVIN NAROTAMBHAI SOLANKI JATE.ANU.JATI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
FRAMING OF CHARGE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 28-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 01-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 25-11-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Surendranagar District Court ordered the abatement of criminal proceedings against the accused under CrPC Section 258, as the accused could not be produced before the court despite the issuance of a warrant and the police's efforts to apprehend them proved unsuccessful. The court found it impractical to continue the trial without the accused's presence and reasoned that there was no likelihood of the accused being found in the foreseeable future, making further judicial action impossible under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Surendranagar District Court ordered the abatement of criminal proceedings against the accused under CrPC Section 258, as the accused could not be produced before the court despite the issuance of a warrant and the police's efforts to apprehend them proved unsuccessful. The court found it impractical to continue the trial without the accused's presence and reasoned that there was no likelihood of the accused being found in the foreseeable future, making further judicial action impossible under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts