ARVINDSINH PRAVINSINH PARMAR vs SHAH NAYAN VINODCHANDRA — 313/2025

Order

The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the case (Section 148 complaint) on the grounds that the respondent could not be located for service of summons and the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the matter. The court granted permission for withdrawal and disposed of the case accordingly, with no order on costs. The case was heard on 18 April 2026 at Surendranagar court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

Process To Accused

3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

Process To Accused

2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 313/2025