P.G.V.C.L. CITY SUB DIVISION-1 vs SAIYAD RAHEMATALI AARIFALI — 17/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN020005242026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

3-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10
Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R2,9
Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L. CITY SUB DIVISION-1

    Adv. K K KARELIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAIYAD RAHEMATALI AARIFALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S NO. 17/2026 The court partially allowed the electricity board's recovery suit against the defendant for electricity theft. The court found that the respondent engaged in unauthorized electricity consumption by using a yellow-colored twin-wire to illegally tap power from an L.T. line, constituting theft of approximately 0.634 kW. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the electricity board Rs. 18,322.47 (comprising Rs. 14,001-45 for electricity theft charges and Rs. 4,321.02 for D.P.L. charges) along with 16% annual interest from the date of the notice, with the amount recoverable from the respondent's property. No litigation costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S NO. 17/2026 The court partially allowed the electricity board's recovery suit against the defendant for electricity theft. The court found that the respondent engaged in unauthorized electricity consumption by using a yellow-colored twin-wire to illegally tap power from an L.T. line, constituting theft of approximately 0.634 kW. The court decreed that the respondent must pay the electricity board Rs. 18,322.47 (comprising Rs. 14,001-45 for electricity theft charges and Rs. 4,321.02 for D.P.L. charges) along with 16% annual interest from the date of the notice, with the amount recoverable from the respondent's property. No litigation costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case