SEJALBEN JIGNESHBHAI SHAH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 269/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29,12,18,19,20,21,22. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSN010026142024
Filing Number
269/2024
Filing Date
04-Dec-2024
Registration No
269/2024
Registration Date
04-Dec-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SEJALBEN JIGNESHBHAI SHAH
Adv. S A RAMANANDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
-
2.MANJULABEN HIMMATLAL SHAH
Adv. N B LAKHATARIA
-
3.BHAVNABEN HIMMATLAL SHAH
Adv. N B LAKHATARIA
-
4.SANGITABEN HIMMATLAL SHAH W.O. RAJESHBHAI SANGHVI
Adv. N B LAKHATARIA
-
5.PRITIBEN HIMMATLAL SHAH W.O. KAUSHIKKUMAR MAHETA
Adv. N B LAKHATARIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the appellant's appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, confirming the trial court's finding that despite proving domestic violence, the appellant is not entitled to suitable accommodation or alternative rent under Section 19. The court found that the appellant owns a house in her own name with a monthly income of Rs. 89,172 and is paying a home loan EMI, demonstrating she has adequate alternative accommodation and is not in a destitute situation requiring the respondents' financial support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 269/2024
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the appellant's appeal under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, confirming the trial court's finding that despite proving domestic violence, the appellant is not entitled to suitable accommodation or alternative rent under Section 19. The court found that the appellant owns a house in her own name with a monthly income of Rs. 89,172 and is paying a home loan EMI, demonstrating she has adequate alternative accommodation and is not in a destitute situation requiring the respondents' financial support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts