Government of Gujarat vs MUKESHBHAI VINODBHAI RAGHVANI Advocate - V J KOSHIYANIYA — 55/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,63(A),64(2)(I)(M). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJSN010025032025
Filing Number
54/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
2-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0250585
Police Station
THANGADH POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUKESHBHAI VINODBHAI RAGHVANI Advocate - V J KOSHIYANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 55/2025 Decision: The accused, Mukeshbhai Vinodbhai Raghvani, is acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 63(k), 64(2)(i)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed rape against the 16-year-old victim. While the victim and her parents testified, their testimonies contained contradictions and lacked corroboration by credible witnesses or medical evidence to substantiate the allegations. Medical examinations did not conclusively establish rape, and forensic reports failed to provide supporting evidence. The prosecution's case was deemed insufficient to meet the rigorous proof standards required in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Judgement
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Further Statement
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2025
Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 55/2025 Decision: The accused, Mukeshbhai Vinodbhai Raghvani, is acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 63(k), 64(2)(i)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed rape against the 16-year-old victim. While the victim and her parents testified, their testimonies contained contradictions and lacked corroboration by credible witnesses or medical evidence to substantiate the allegations. Medical examinations did not conclusively establish rape, and forensic reports failed to provide supporting evidence. The prosecution's case was deemed insufficient to meet the rigorous proof standards required in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts