Government of Gujarat vs CHANDUBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - L A D C_B M ZALA — 32/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(1)(I). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJSN010017292025

Filing Number

31/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

14-Aug-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

2-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0250372

Police Station

THANGADH POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(1)(I)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. DGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDUBHAI JETHABHAI CHAVDA Advocate - L A D C_B M ZALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 32/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Chandubhai Jethabhai Chavda, is acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 75(1)(i) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 12. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused sexually assaulted the minor victim. While the victim's birth date (08/09/2010) was established, proving she was a minor at the time of the alleged incident (15/06/2025), the prosecution could not substantiate that the accused touched her inappropriately or committed any sexual offense. The victim's own testimony contradicted key allegations, and supporting witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's narrative. Insufficient credible evidence linked the accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 07-Oct-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 23-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 09-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 26-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 32/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Chandubhai Jethabhai Chavda, is acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 75(1)(i) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 12. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused sexually assaulted the minor victim. While the victim's birth date (08/09/2010) was established, proving she was a minor at the time of the alleged incident (15/06/2025), the prosecution could not substantiate that the accused touched her inappropriately or committed any sexual offense. The victim's own testimony contradicted key allegations, and supporting witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's narrative. Insufficient credible evidence linked the accused to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case