LEGAL HEIR DECEASE OF DILSADBEN YUNUSBHAI CHAMADIYA(Legal Heir) vs VIRALBHAI SHAILESHKUMAR PATTANI Advocate - B C PATTANI — 60/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: OPPONENTS EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJSN010009162023
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
Filing Number
60/2023
Filing Date
08-08-2023
Registration No
60/2023
Registration Date
08-08-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEGAL HEIR DECEASE OF DILSADBEN YUNUSBHAI CHAMADIYA(Legal Heir)
Adv. C H BHATT1.
AMANBHAI YUNUSBHAI CHAMADIYA
Adv. C H BHATT1.
VISHAKHABEN YUNUSBHAI CHAMADIYA
Adv. C H BHATT1.
YASHBHAI YUNUSBHAI CHAMADIYA
Adv. C H BHATT
Respondent(s)
VIRALBHAI SHAILESHKUMAR PATTANI Advocate - B C PATTANI
LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
YUNUSBHAI ALIBHAI CHAMADIYA
H.D.F.C. ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
Adv. C H SHUKLA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In M.A.C.P. No. 60/2023, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Surendranagar allowed the application to substitute the parties. HDFC Insurance Co. was ordered to be deleted as opponent, and Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. was ordered to be joined as the new opponent, as it was the actual third-party insurer covering the vehicle during the alleged accident period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In M.A.C.P. No. 60/2023, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Surendranagar allowed the application to substitute the parties. HDFC Insurance Co. was ordered to be deleted as opponent, and Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. was ordered to be joined as the new opponent, as it was the actual third-party insurer covering the vehicle during the alleged accident period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts