CHAMPABEN CHANDABHAI DHORIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 265/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN010006612026
Filing Number
265/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
265/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
2-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAMPABEN CHANDABHAI DHORIYA
Adv. L M ZALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 265/2026 - Champaben Chandabhai Dhoriya v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner sought recovery of a seized Mahindra tractor (with attached compressor machine) under CrPC Section 497. The court, considering the mineral department's opinion that the equipment was involved in illegal mineral mining operations, initially rejected the petition. However, the petitioner filed a subsequent petition clarifying that a higher court had ordered the compressor machine's release alongside the tractor. The Special Judge granted the petition, ordering the tractor and compressor machinery be returned to the petitioner during the interim period, subject to the earlier conditions and the higher court's bail orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 265/2026
Case Summary: 265/2026 - Champaben Chandabhai Dhoriya v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner sought recovery of a seized Mahindra tractor (with attached compressor machine) under CrPC Section 497. The court, considering the mineral department's opinion that the equipment was involved in illegal mineral mining operations, initially rejected the petition. However, the petitioner filed a subsequent petition clarifying that a higher court had ordered the compressor machine's release alongside the tractor. The Special Judge granted the petition, ordering the tractor and compressor machinery be returned to the petitioner during the interim period, subject to the earlier conditions and the higher court's bail orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts