HASAMUKHBHAI NARASHIBHAI RAMI vs CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA — 27/2022
Case under Telegraph Act, Indian 1885 Section 10D,16(3). Status: Evidence Of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJSN010006562022
Filing Number
27/2022
Filing Date
21-Apr-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
21-Apr-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th Addl District Judge
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HASAMUKHBHAI NARASHIBHAI RAMI
Adv. P H ACHHADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
-
3.DY. COLLECTOR AND SUB DIVISINAL MAGISTRATE SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
-
4.EXECUTIVE MAGI. AND MAMLATDAR SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-May-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Apr-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
22-May-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
20-May-2023
OrderView PDF
Summary: In C.M.A. No. 27/2022, the Principal District Judge of Surendranagar granted a final adjournment on the opponent's application dated 20/05/2023. The court directed that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on the material already available on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Dec-2022
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
12-Oct-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
06-Sep-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Aug-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2022
Summary: In C.M.A. No. 27/2022, the Principal District Judge of Surendranagar granted a final adjournment on the opponent's application dated 20/05/2023. The court directed that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on the material already available on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts