RAMANIKBHAI RUPABHAI KOLI vs CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA — 25/2022
Case under Telegraph Act, Indian 1885 Section 10D,16(3). Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJSN010006542022
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
25/2022
Filing Date
21-04-2022
Registration No
25/2022
Registration Date
21-04-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMANIKBHAI RUPABHAI KOLI
Adv. P H ACHHADA
Respondent(s)
CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA
DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
DY. COLLECTOR AND SUB DIVISINAL MAGISTRATE SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
EXECUTIVE MAGI. AND MAMLATDAR SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 15-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 26-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 25/2022, the Principal District Judge of Surendranagar granted a final adjournment to the opponent with a direction that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on available record. Order dated 20/05/2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 25/2022, the Principal District Judge of Surendranagar granted a final adjournment to the opponent with a direction that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on available record. Order dated 20/05/2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts