GOVINDBHAI DUDABHAI @ DHUDABHAI vs CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA — 21/2022
Case under Telegraph Act, Indian 1885 Section 10D,16(3). Status: Evidence Of Applicant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJSN010006442022
Filing Number
21/2022
Filing Date
20-Apr-2022
Registration No
21/2022
Registration Date
20-Apr-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th Addl District Judge
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI DUDABHAI @ DHUDABHAI
Adv. P H ACHHADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIEF MANAGER AND PROP. OF STARLITE POWER LTD. NEW DELHI(LAKADIYA-VADODARA TRANSMITION PROJECT Advocate - N M KARATHIYA
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
-
3.DY. COLLECTOR AND SUB DIVISINAL MAGISTRATE SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
-
4.EXECUTIVE MAGI. AND MAMLATDAR SHREE
Adv. P B MAKWANA
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-May-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Apr-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Issues
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Written Statement/Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
22-May-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
20-May-2023
OrderView PDF
Case Adjournment Granted In CMA No. 21/2022 before the Principal District Judge, Surendranagar, the final adjournment application of the opponent has been granted. The court directed that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on available record materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2023
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Dec-2022
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
12-Oct-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
06-Sep-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Aug-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
Notice To Opponents
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2022
Case Adjournment Granted In CMA No. 21/2022 before the Principal District Judge, Surendranagar, the final adjournment application of the opponent has been granted. The court directed that if the opponent fails to file a reply, the pending application shall be decided on merit based on available record materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts