DANABHAI DHUDABHAI BHUVA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 252/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN010006342026
Filing Number
252/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
252/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
2-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DANABHAI DHUDABHAI BHUVA
Adv. H A PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
-
2.BHUSTAR VIGYAN ANE KHAN KHANIJ VIBHAG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA 252/2026 Court Decision: The court ALLOWED the application and granted interim custody of the seized excavator machine to petitioner Danabhai Dhudabhai Bhuva, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bank guarantee of 1.5 times the machine's value and a personal surety bond. Key Reasoning: While the machine was found at an illegal mining site, the court found the applicant proved lawful ownership through purchase bills and bank no-objection certificates. Relying on Gujarat High Court precedent, the court held that despite special mining laws, judicial magistrates retain discretion under Section 497 BNSS to grant interim custody of seized vehicles when the owner faces financial loss from prolonged non-use, provided stringent safeguards are imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 252/2026
Case Summary: CRMA 252/2026 Court Decision: The court ALLOWED the application and granted interim custody of the seized excavator machine to petitioner Danabhai Dhudabhai Bhuva, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a bank guarantee of 1.5 times the machine's value and a personal surety bond. Key Reasoning: While the machine was found at an illegal mining site, the court found the applicant proved lawful ownership through purchase bills and bank no-objection certificates. Relying on Gujarat High Court precedent, the court held that despite special mining laws, judicial magistrates retain discretion under Section 497 BNSS to grant interim custody of seized vehicles when the owner faces financial loss from prolonged non-use, provided stringent safeguards are imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts