ASHOKBHAI GAGAJIBHAI JAGA vs MADHUBEN BHARATSINH BARIYA — 39/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJSN010006112022
Filing Number
39/2022
Filing Date
13-04-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
13-04-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOKBHAI GAGAJIBHAI JAGA
Adv. C H BHATT
Respondent(s)
MADHUBEN BHARATSINH BARIYA
THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
Adv. B K SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-02-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Surendranagar partly allowed a compensation claim filed by a 27-year-old laborer injured in a motorcycle-Tavera collision on September 11, 2022. The tribunal found the Tavera driver 75% negligent and the motorcyclist 25% negligent, awarding the claimant Rs. 2,18,100 (after deducting the motorcyclist's contributory negligence) with 9% annual interest, calculated based on loss of future income, pain and suffering, medical expenses, and actual income loss due to the permanent 15% functional disability sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Surendranagar partly allowed a compensation claim filed by a 27-year-old laborer injured in a motorcycle-Tavera collision on September 11, 2022. The tribunal found the Tavera driver 75% negligent and the motorcyclist 25% negligent, awarding the claimant Rs. 2,18,100 (after deducting the motorcyclist's contributory negligence) with 9% annual interest, calculated based on loss of future income, pain and suffering, medical expenses, and actual income loss due to the permanent 15% functional disability sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts