JUNEDBHAI JAVEDBHAI JAINDANI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 225/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN010004652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
225/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
225/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JUNEDBHAI JAVEDBHAI JAINDANI
Adv. M R BHATTI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.225/2026 | 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Junedabhai Javedbhai Jeedani, who was charged under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 34. The accused, along with co-accused employees of RBS Capital Finance, allegedly defrauded customers by approving loans without disbursing funds and misappropriating Rs. 35,93,774. The court found substantial grounds for investigation, potential witness tampering risks, and the possibility of flight, making bail detention appropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.225/2026 | 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Junedabhai Javedbhai Jeedani, who was charged under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 34. The accused, along with co-accused employees of RBS Capital Finance, allegedly defrauded customers by approving loans without disbursing funds and misappropriating Rs. 35,93,774. The court found substantial grounds for investigation, potential witness tampering risks, and the possibility of flight, making bail detention appropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts