JUNEDBHAI JAVEDBHAI JAINDANI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 225/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010004652026

Filing Number

225/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

225/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(5),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JUNEDBHAI JAVEDBHAI JAINDANI

    Adv. M R BHATTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.225/2026 | 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Junedabhai Javedbhai Jeedani, who was charged under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 34. The accused, along with co-accused employees of RBS Capital Finance, allegedly defrauded customers by approving loans without disbursing funds and misappropriating Rs. 35,93,774. The court found substantial grounds for investigation, potential witness tampering risks, and the possibility of flight, making bail detention appropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.225/2026 | 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of accused Junedabhai Javedbhai Jeedani, who was charged under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 34. The accused, along with co-accused employees of RBS Capital Finance, allegedly defrauded customers by approving loans without disbursing funds and misappropriating Rs. 35,93,774. The court found substantial grounds for investigation, potential witness tampering risks, and the possibility of flight, making bail detention appropriate at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case