RASHUL NATHUBHAI DAFER vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 224/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010004642026

Filing Number

224/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103(1),109(1),111(2)(A),111(3),54
Arms Act Section 25(1)(AB)A,27
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHUL NATHUBHAI DAFER

    Adv. F I KARIYANIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Surendranagar granted bail to the applicant Rasul Nathubhai Dofer under CrPC Section 483. The court found that the applicant's elderly father required immediate surgical operation and the applicant needed to be present for his care and post-operative support. While considering the applicant's criminal history (68 previous cases), the court balanced the medical necessity against detention, granting bail with conditions that the applicant would comply with all bail terms and not misuse his freedom. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Surendranagar granted bail to the applicant Rasul Nathubhai Dofer under CrPC Section 483. The court found that the applicant's elderly father required immediate surgical operation and the applicant needed to be present for his care and post-operative support. While considering the applicant's criminal history (68 previous cases), the court balanced the medical necessity against detention, granting bail with conditions that the applicant would comply with all bail terms and not misuse his freedom. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case