SURAJKUMAR NEKRAJ SHILARAM vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 223/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN010004412026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
223/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAJKUMAR NEKRAJ SHILARAM
Adv. T A VYAS
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.223/2026 – Surendranagar Court The court rejected the accused's bail application for a 15-day temporary bail to undergo private hospital treatment for kidney stone surgery. The court found the accused's claim unjustified, noting that free government medical treatment was already available at U.N. Mehta Hospital in Ahmedabad where the accused was already undergoing treatment. The court held that an undertrial prisoner cannot select a particular doctor or private hospital and that adequate medical facilities were accessible within the city, making the bail plea baseless and the petition accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary CRMA NO.223/2026 – Surendranagar Court The court rejected the accused's bail application for a 15-day temporary bail to undergo private hospital treatment for kidney stone surgery. The court found the accused's claim unjustified, noting that free government medical treatment was already available at U.N. Mehta Hospital in Ahmedabad where the accused was already undergoing treatment. The court held that an undertrial prisoner cannot select a particular doctor or private hospital and that adequate medical facilities were accessible within the city, making the bail plea baseless and the petition accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts