GHANSHYAMBHAI BHOJABHAI GAMARA vs GAU KRUPA MILK PRODUCER COMPANY — 222/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN010004402026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
222/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GHANSHYAMBHAI BHOJABHAI GAMARA
Adv. K V SHAH
Respondent(s)
GAU KRUPA MILK PRODUCER COMPANY
Government of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar, condoned a 163-day delay in filing a criminal appeal by Ghansyambhai Bhojabhai Gamara, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to one year imprisonment with Rs. 71,300 compensation. The court found the delay justified due to the applicant's absence during judgment pronouncement, his lack of legal knowledge, and family hardship, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 2,500 with the District Legal Services Authority as a condition to proceed with the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar, condoned a 163-day delay in filing a criminal appeal by Ghansyambhai Bhojabhai Gamara, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to one year imprisonment with Rs. 71,300 compensation. The court found the delay justified due to the applicant's absence during judgment pronouncement, his lack of legal knowledge, and family hardship, prioritizing substantial justice over technical procedural requirements. The applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 2,500 with the District Legal Services Authority as a condition to proceed with the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts