DEVSINGBHAI GEMAJI ODHA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 215/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010004132026

Filing Number

215/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65A,65E,81,83,116B,98(2)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 111(2)(B),111(3),111(4),336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVSINGBHAI GEMAJI ODHA

    Adv. P A TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Sessions Court dismissed the applicant's petition seeking interim custody of his seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero) under Section 497 of BNSS. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, where seized liquor exceeds 20 liters, the vehicle cannot be released on bond or surety pending trial, citing amended rules and High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court dismissed the applicant's petition seeking interim custody of his seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero) under Section 497 of BNSS. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, where seized liquor exceeds 20 liters, the vehicle cannot be released on bond or surety pending trial, citing amended rules and High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case