MANKUBHAI DADBHAI DHADHL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 212/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010004092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

212/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 109(1),351(3),352,351(2),249B,
ARMS ACT Section 25(1-B)A,27,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

MANKUBHAI DADBHAI DHADHL

Adv. D N SADADIYA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

This is a Gujarati language judgment from the Surat District Court (Sessions Judge) dated March 6, 2026. The court granted bail to the applicant Manusubhai Dhadhal under CrPC Section 483 in a criminal case registered at Chiraj Police Station. The court imposed strict conditions including regular police reporting, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and prohibitions against contacting witnesses or tampering with evidence, while directing the applicant to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Gujarati language judgment from the Surat District Court (Sessions Judge) dated March 6, 2026. The court granted bail to the applicant Manusubhai Dhadhal under CrPC Section 483 in a criminal case registered at Chiraj Police Station. The court imposed strict conditions including regular police reporting, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and prohibitions against contacting witnesses or tampering with evidence, while directing the applicant to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case