UPENDRABHAI GUNAVANTBHAI ACHARYA vs CHIRAGBHAI BABUBHAI PADMANI Advocate - P C SHAH — 66/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSN010003642026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
66/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
66/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UPENDRABHAI GUNAVANTBHAI ACHARYA
Adv. A C RANINGA
Respondent(s)
CHIRAGBHAI BABUBHAI PADMANI Advocate - P C SHAH
Government of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 66/2026, the 6th Additional Sessions Judge at Surendranagar allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the trial court's conviction. The court found that the trial court violated principles of natural justice by denying the accused effective cross-examination of the complainant's evidence. The judgment emphasizes that cross-examination is an integral part of natural justice, and without providing the accused a fair opportunity to test the complainant's credibility, the conviction cannot stand. The case involved alleged cheque dishonor under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 66/2026, the 6th Additional Sessions Judge at Surendranagar allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the trial court's conviction. The court found that the trial court violated principles of natural justice by denying the accused effective cross-examination of the complainant's evidence. The judgment emphasizes that cross-examination is an integral part of natural justice, and without providing the accused a fair opportunity to test the complainant's credibility, the conviction cannot stand. The case involved alleged cheque dishonor under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts