KARSHANBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 163/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010003352026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8B,8C,20A(i),20B(2)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARSHANBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. D J MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

  2. 2.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Surendranagar partially allowed the applicant Karsanbhai Malabhai Parmar's petition for custody of a John Deere 5105 Y2 tractor (Registration No. 13-CI-BI-3422) that was seized in a criminal case. The court approved releasing the vehicle to the applicant as the rightful owner, subject to strict conditions including proper documentation, bond/surety requirements, four colored photographs for court records, and restrictions on selling or transferring the vehicle without court permission until the case concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Surendranagar partially allowed the applicant Karsanbhai Malabhai Parmar's petition for custody of a John Deere 5105 Y2 tractor (Registration No. 13-CI-BI-3422) that was seized in a criminal case. The court approved releasing the vehicle to the applicant as the rightful owner, subject to strict conditions including proper documentation, bond/surety requirements, four colored photographs for court records, and restrictions on selling or transferring the vehicle without court permission until the case concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case