KATHUBHAI BHOJBHAI KHACHAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 146/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408,. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN010003072026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

146/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 408,
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 307,395,325,323,504,506(2),427,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

KATHUBHAI BHOJBHAI KHACHAR

Adv. P M DHRUVA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

12-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Sessions Judge at Surendranagar dismissed the accused's application seeking transfer of Sessions Case No. 16/2015 from the 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge to the Additional District & Sessions Judge at Limbdi. The court found the transfer request lacked merit and bona fides, noting that arguments had concluded 10 months prior, the request was made belatedly, and the original judge was retiring soon, making the accused's grounds appear opportunistic rather than genuine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Surendranagar dismissed the accused's application seeking transfer of Sessions Case No. 16/2015 from the 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge to the Additional District & Sessions Judge at Limbdi. The court found the transfer request lacked merit and bona fides, noting that arguments had concluded 10 months prior, the request was made belatedly, and the original judge was retiring soon, making the accused's grounds appear opportunistic rather than genuine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURENDRANAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case