GUJARIBEN ANABHAI GAMAR vs GAMAR SHANTIBHAI KHALABHAI Advocate - H.N.TRIVEDI — 4/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,1,2,151,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSK190001762020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2020
Filing Date
02-12-2020
Registration No
4/2020
Registration Date
02-12-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, POSHINA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUJARIBEN ANABHAI GAMAR
Adv. B.S.VAGHELA
GAMAR LEBRIBEN ANABHAI
GAMAR VADRIBEN ANABHAI
GAMAR MIRKHANBHAI ANABHAI
GAMAR SAVJIBHAI ANABHAI
Respondent(s)
GAMAR SHANTIBHAI KHALABHAI Advocate - H.N.TRIVEDI
GAMAR BHAMRUBHAI SAJUBHAI
GAMAR NANIYABHAI LADUBHAI
GAMAR RATNABHAI PABUBHAI
GAMAR KALIYABHAI SHANTIBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim for permanent injunction and possession of agricultural land (survey numbers 101, 104, 188, and 224) against the defendants. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to prove they inherited the property from their ancestors or that the defendants had illegally encroached on half of their land. The court ruled against the plaintiffs on all issues raised and ordered each party to bear their own legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim for permanent injunction and possession of agricultural land (survey numbers 101, 104, 188, and 224) against the defendants. The judge found that the plaintiffs failed to prove they inherited the property from their ancestors or that the defendants had illegally encroached on half of their land. The court ruled against the plaintiffs on all issues raised and ordered each party to bear their own legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts