L AND T COMANY VATI SURPALSINH G PARMAR vs JAVANJI SHAKAJI THAKARDA — 24/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJSK180013182024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

24/2024

Filing Date

15-10-2024

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

15-10-2024

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR

Judge

2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

385

Police Station

IDAR POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 438,
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 408,409,406,420,465,467,468,471,120B,

Petitioner(s)

L AND T COMANY VATI SURPALSINH G PARMAR

Adv. R A GADHAVI

Respondent(s)

JAVANJI SHAKAJI THAKARDA

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

24-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

21-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

27-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

06-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Idar dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by L&T Company (through representative Surpalsingh Parmar) challenging a trial court's order dated 30/01/2024. The court held the revision petition was not maintainable as it was filed beyond the 90-day statutory limitation period prescribed under Article 131 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and no extension of time was sought before filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Idar dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by L&T Company (through representative Surpalsingh Parmar) challenging a trial court's order dated 30/01/2024. The court held the revision petition was not maintainable as it was filed beyond the 90-day statutory limitation period prescribed under Article 131 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and no extension of time was sought before filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case