MAS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH LOA HOLDER DIPAKKUMAR L DARJI vs JITENDRA DAHYAJI THAKRADA Advocate - B K BHAVSAR — 2/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 36,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 08th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJSK180009702025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2025
Filing Date
20-09-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
20-09-2025
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR
Judge
2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED THROUGH LOA HOLDER DIPAKKUMAR L DARJI
Adv. S V JANI
Respondent(s)
JITENDRA DAHYAJI THAKRADA Advocate - B K BHAVSAR
DASRATH BALAJI CHAUHAN (GUARANTOR)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 25-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 18-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 13-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the decree holder's application for recovery of Rs. 3,64,132/- from the judgment debtor, as the defendant submitted checks in compliance with court orders and deposited Rs. 30,000/- in court. The court held that if the submitted checks fail to clear, the decree holder can pursue legal action against the defendant, and therefore dismissed the present application as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the decree holder's application for recovery of Rs. 3,64,132/- from the judgment debtor, as the defendant submitted checks in compliance with court orders and deposited Rs. 30,000/- in court. The court held that if the submitted checks fail to clear, the decree holder can pursue legal action against the defendant, and therefore dismissed the present application as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts