MOHANBHAI ROMABHAI BHAOBHI vs COLLOCTOR SHREE Advocate - P J SONI — 11/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,R-1,96,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJSK180004812024

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

11/2024

Filing Date

20-03-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

20-03-2024

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 41,R-1,96,

Petitioner(s)

MOHANBHAI ROMABHAI BHAOBHI

Adv. S V PARMAR

PARAGBHAI PUNJABHAI BHOBHI

Respondent(s)

COLLOCTOR SHREE Advocate - P J SONI

DEPUTY COLLOCTOR SHRI

Adv. P J SONI

TALATI CUM MANTRI SHRI

Adv. P J MEHTA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

15-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-12-2025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-11-2025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-10-2025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

13-10-2025
ORDER
13-10-2025
ORDER

Case Summary Regular Civil Appeal No. 11/2024 – The appellants/original plaintiffs sought interim injunction during the pending appeal against the trial court's order rejecting their suit under CPC Order 7 Rule-11(A)(D) in a land dispute matter. The court rejected the interim injunction application, finding no prima facie case in favor of the appellants and concluding that granting injunction would cause irreparable loss and hardship to the respondents/original defendants. The appellants were given an opportunity to submit final written arguments if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Regular Civil Appeal No. 11/2024 – The appellants/original plaintiffs sought interim injunction during the pending appeal against the trial court's order rejecting their suit under CPC Order 7 Rule-11(A)(D) in a land dispute matter. The court rejected the interim injunction application, finding no prima facie case in favor of the appellants and concluding that granting injunction would cause irreparable loss and hardship to the respondents/original defendants. The appellants were given an opportunity to submit final written arguments if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case