MOHANBHAI ROMABHAI BHAOBHI vs COLLOCTOR SHREE Advocate - P J SONI — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41,R-1,96,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJSK180004812024
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2024
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHANBHAI ROMABHAI BHAOBHI
Adv. S V PARMAR
PARAGBHAI PUNJABHAI BHOBHI
Respondent(s)
COLLOCTOR SHREE Advocate - P J SONI
DEPUTY COLLOCTOR SHRI
Adv. P J SONI
TALATI CUM MANTRI SHRI
Adv. P J MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 15-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-11-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-10-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Regular Civil Appeal No. 11/2024 – The appellants/original plaintiffs sought interim injunction during the pending appeal against the trial court's order rejecting their suit under CPC Order 7 Rule-11(A)(D) in a land dispute matter. The court rejected the interim injunction application, finding no prima facie case in favor of the appellants and concluding that granting injunction would cause irreparable loss and hardship to the respondents/original defendants. The appellants were given an opportunity to submit final written arguments if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Regular Civil Appeal No. 11/2024 – The appellants/original plaintiffs sought interim injunction during the pending appeal against the trial court's order rejecting their suit under CPC Order 7 Rule-11(A)(D) in a land dispute matter. The court rejected the interim injunction application, finding no prima facie case in favor of the appellants and concluding that granting injunction would cause irreparable loss and hardship to the respondents/original defendants. The appellants were given an opportunity to submit final written arguments if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts