THE STATE, GUJARAT vs PIYUSHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PANDYA Advocate - M J PATEL — 23/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,354(A)(1), (i)(ii)(iii) 354(D),452,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJSK180003262016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
23/2016
Filing Date
07-06-2016
Registration No
23/2016
Registration Date
07-06-2016
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR
Judge
2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
IDAR POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE, GUJARAT
Adv. P J SONI
Respondent(s)
PIYUSHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PANDYA Advocate - M J PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 20-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 18-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The accused, Piyushbhai Jayantilal Pandya, has been acquitted and discharged of all charges under IPC Sections 376, 354(A), 354(D), 452, 504, 506(2). Key Finding: The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the alleged rape and sexual harassment through credible evidence. While the victim's testimony contained inconsistencies and contradictions across different statements (FIR, medical history, and CrPC Section 164 statement), critical forensic evidence did not support the allegations—no semen, blood, or conclusive biological evidence was found despite proper sample collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts