RAMESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A J PATEL — 137/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIM MISC. APPLIC - SESSI
CNR: GJSK180002972026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
137/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
137/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
87
Police Station
Kheroj Police Station, Poshina
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. B I LIMANI
MUKESHBHAI BHIKHABHAI PARMAR
Adv. B I LIMANI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - A J PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Idar rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Ramesh Babu Parmar and Mukesh Babu Parmar) under Section 483 of the Indian Penal Code, filed on March 11, 2026. The court found that the accused were involved in smuggling foreign-branded liquor bottles (3,300 units worth ₹5,61,600) and a pickup vehicle, and determined that granting bail would hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially facilitate further criminal activities related to the illicit liquor trade. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Idar rejected the bail application of two accused persons (Ramesh Babu Parmar and Mukesh Babu Parmar) under Section 483 of the Indian Penal Code, filed on March 11, 2026. The court found that the accused were involved in smuggling foreign-branded liquor bottles (3,300 units worth ₹5,61,600) and a pickup vehicle, and determined that granting bail would hamper the ongoing investigation and potentially facilitate further criminal activities related to the illicit liquor trade. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts