CHETANBHAI VAKHATRAM BUBADIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P J SONI — 135/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIM MISC. APPLIC - SESSI

CNR: GJSK180002952026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR

Judge

2-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

233

Police Station

Kheroj Police Station, Poshina

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,307,435,427,120B,212,201
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)(A),27
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHETANBHAI VAKHATRAM BUBADIYA

    Adv. U N GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P J SONI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court in Idar rejected the applicant's bail application under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 435, 427, 120B, 212, 201, and Arms Act Sections 25(1-B), 27, and GPS Act Section 135. The court found that the applicant was involved in serious criminal activities including extortion, vehicle vandalism, and threats against a complainant, with 27 cases registered against him across multiple police stations and prior bail rejections. Considering the severity of charges, the applicant's criminal conduct, and the risk of evidence tampering, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court in Idar rejected the applicant's bail application under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 435, 427, 120B, 212, 201, and Arms Act Sections 25(1-B), 27, and GPS Act Section 135. The court found that the applicant was involved in serious criminal activities including extortion, vehicle vandalism, and threats against a complainant, with 27 cases registered against him across multiple police stations and prior bail rejections. Considering the severity of charges, the applicant's criminal conduct, and the risk of evidence tampering, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case