GOPALSINH SANGRAMSINH RATHOD vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P J SONI — 102/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIM MISC. APPLIC - SESSI
CNR: GJSK180002272026
Filing Number
102/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, IDAR
Judge
1-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
IDAR POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPALSINH SANGRAMSINH RATHOD
Adv. M D ZALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P J SONI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Gopalsinh Sangramsinh Rathod under CrPC Section 438 in a case involving alleged violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the applicant was accused of illegally possessing and transporting foreign liquor worth approximately ₹6.42 lakh, and that serious charges under the Prohibition Act sections warranted denial of bail to prevent obstruction of investigation and protect public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2026
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Gopalsinh Sangramsinh Rathod under CrPC Section 438 in a case involving alleged violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court found that the applicant was accused of illegally possessing and transporting foreign liquor worth approximately ₹6.42 lakh, and that serious charges under the Prohibition Act sections warranted denial of bail to prevent obstruction of investigation and protect public order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts