S.R.BODAR LABOUR OFFICER vs KESHAVLAL MAHENDRABHAI PATEL OWNER OF HOTEL VINAY — 3/2026

Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 18. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK150000352026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.R.BODAR LABOUR OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KESHAVLAL MAHENDRABHAI PATEL OWNER OF HOTEL VINAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Labour Court) at Himatnagar convicted hotel owner Keshavlal Mehendrabhai Patel for violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt to charges under multiple provisions including Rule 26(D), 26(2), 26-B(1), and others related to wage violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 14,000, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Labour Court) at Himatnagar convicted hotel owner Keshavlal Mehendrabhai Patel for violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt to charges under multiple provisions including Rule 26(D), 26(2), 26-B(1), and others related to wage violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 14,000, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case